 |
| Anna Hazare |
Very few social activist have capture the
attention of Indians across the globe as
Anna Hazare did dying his "fast unto
death" over the issue of lokpal Bill.
According to details provide by India
Against Corruption (IAC), which
spearheaded the campaign,received huge
donation and have issued receipt to all
the donors and have mentioned a record of
their details, and published on Internet
also.
My question :
I want to know and my question is that ....
Did Anna receive donation of Rs. 1 crore from Arindam Choudhuri ? I have read in Times Of India , Mumbai, that Anna had refused to take Arindam's donation,but Arindam claims that he donated Rs. 1 crore to Anna and he has mentioned on "Facebook" also,dated on 8 April 2011.
There is no name of Arindam Choudhuri in donor's list , which is published by " India against Corruption " team.What is true ? If Anna received donation ,he should declare or if did not received than why Arindam is claiming ?
We have right yo know, and "India against Corruption" team should clarify about this.They are fighting against corruption,They can ask any question to government about their work, so we could not ask any question to Anna ?
Updated: 30/10/11,4:37 AM,
On 11 September 2011,I had asked to Anna and Anna team about donated money, which they received from several sources.
I was asked , why I am raising this question ? Why I am against Anna and Anna team ?
I want to clear that I am not against Anna , although I am against his Modus-Operendi. I have right to ask any clarification in favour of public interest.
They are using " Rights of Information" rights as a weapon.
These days they are also facing misutilising of funds and their trust. There are some complain against Anna'trust.
Now Kiran Bedi is being claimed for misutilising the donated money.She says, I am ready to refund all money. Very good, then all leaders and criminals should be released after refunding money.
Arbind Kejrival in the radius of IT department.He is also corrupt.
Prashant Bhushan has given statement in favour of Kashmir.According to him, which state wants freedom to make a new country then Government should allow them stating that if you are not willing to be a part of India,its ok, Right, Mr. Prashant Bhushan ?
Swami Agnives claimed Arbind for misutilising the donated money.
Magha patkar is also not happy with the team.
Mr.Digvijay singh has raised several question time to time, but AAM-PUBLIC do not accept any statement against Anna.
Why , I am not agree :
They use Right of Information as weapon, it is unfair.
They do not believe in Saansad, They believe in Sansad. (Sansad is runned by Saansad.)
There is no any power in Anna and Anna team. Public is their power, They are using public against Government.
Our public follows blindly , Public should also understand, first.
There are some procedure for law In law, no one can be allowed to using public power.
What Anna and Anna team are enough strong to make a lokpal bill.
Are they fully qualified for making a law ?
They have no right to say , Sansad ka gherao karo, Jo sansad baat nahi mane usko vote mat do. Unke ghar par joa- dharna do. what is this ? Threatening or blackmailing ?
Direct question to Anna Anna-Team :
Why public funds was misutilised ?
Why all money did not declared ?
Why are you giving political statement ?
Why do you not follow law and constitution ?
Why are you taking disadvantage of public mentality ?
Why are you black mailing to the government threatening that if you will not pass the lokpal bill then public will come on the road ?
Why are you appealing to the public do not vote to a particular party ?
Direct question to AAM-PUBLIC :
Why do you follow blindly ?
There are many social - Bimari except corruption e.g. poverty, education, honour killing, etc. Why do you not come out in favour of them ?
My View :
I accept that there are corruption and AAM-Public is against corruption .Corruption should be finished but How and who will finish ?
I openly say that I am not agree with Anna and Anna-Team's modus-operendi.
If Anna can ask any question to the Government then, can I not ask some question to him ?
I am also a AAM-PUBLIC , so I am asking questions directly to AAM-PUBLIC,Leaders ,Anna and Anna-Team.
I have been asking many question to Anna , leaders and AAM-PUBLIC and keep doing so.I have right to ask any logical question to any responsible person.
Sunday, Mumbai.
Updated: 30/10/11,4:37 AM,
On 11 September 2011,I had asked to Anna and Anna team about donated money, which they received from several sources.
I was asked , why I am raising this question ? Why I am against Anna and Anna team ?
I want to clear that I am not against Anna , although I am against his Modus-Operendi. I have right to ask any clarification in favour of public interest.
They are using " Rights of Information" rights as a weapon.
These days they are also facing misutilising of funds and their trust. There are some complain against Anna'trust.
Now Kiran Bedi is being claimed for misutilising the donated money.She says, I am ready to refund all money. Very good, then all leaders and criminals should be released after refunding money.
Arbind Kejrival in the radius of IT department.He is also corrupt.
Prashant Bhushan has given statement in favour of Kashmir.According to him, which state wants freedom to make a new country then Government should allow them stating that if you are not willing to be a part of India,its ok, Right, Mr. Prashant Bhushan ?
Swami Agnives claimed Arbind for misutilising the donated money.
Magha patkar is also not happy with the team.
Mr.Digvijay singh has raised several question time to time, but AAM-PUBLIC do not accept any statement against Anna.
Why , I am not agree :
They use Right of Information as weapon, it is unfair.
They do not believe in Saansad, They believe in Sansad. (Sansad is runned by Saansad.)
There is no any power in Anna and Anna team. Public is their power, They are using public against Government.
Our public follows blindly , Public should also understand, first.
There are some procedure for law In law, no one can be allowed to using public power.
What Anna and Anna team are enough strong to make a lokpal bill.
Are they fully qualified for making a law ?
They have no right to say , Sansad ka gherao karo, Jo sansad baat nahi mane usko vote mat do. Unke ghar par joa- dharna do. what is this ? Threatening or blackmailing ?
Direct question to Anna Anna-Team :
Why public funds was misutilised ?
Why all money did not declared ?
Why are you giving political statement ?
Why do you not follow law and constitution ?
Why are you taking disadvantage of public mentality ?
Why are you black mailing to the government threatening that if you will not pass the lokpal bill then public will come on the road ?
Why are you appealing to the public do not vote to a particular party ?
Direct question to AAM-PUBLIC :
Why do you follow blindly ?
There are many social - Bimari except corruption e.g. poverty, education, honour killing, etc. Why do you not come out in favour of them ?
My View :
I accept that there are corruption and AAM-Public is against corruption .Corruption should be finished but How and who will finish ?
I openly say that I am not agree with Anna and Anna-Team's modus-operendi.
If Anna can ask any question to the Government then, can I not ask some question to him ?
I am also a AAM-PUBLIC , so I am asking questions directly to AAM-PUBLIC,Leaders ,Anna and Anna-Team.
I have been asking many question to Anna , leaders and AAM-PUBLIC and keep doing so.I have right to ask any logical question to any responsible person.
Keep Watch on me, very soon ,I will be back with different but logical question.
Update... 12/12/11
Why Anna uses Rahul Gandhi name in Lokpal bill without evidence ?
Update... 12/12/11
Rahul Gandhi behind U-turn on Bill: Anna Hazare
Why Anna uses Rahul Gandhi name in Lokpal bill without evidence ?
He is using Rahul name for his popularity and grabs the attention of media.
Mostly crowd are fabricated and managed ?
My answer to you is,one, we don't follow blindly. WE are against politicians doesn't mean we blindly follow Annaji.
ReplyDeleteTwo, yes there are other bimaris other than corruption. If the govt. officials and the politicians are not trustworthy, do you think it is easy to make a development in those(poverty, education etc.) areas. Govt is the root of a country. If the root itself is decayed what use is it in watering.
You-My answer to you is,one, we don't follow blindly.
ReplyDeleteMe-I am agree with you but Mostly people follow blindly.
You-WE are against politicians doesn't mean we blindly follow Annaji.
Me-Why we should go against all politician, we should go against corrupt politician.
You-Two, yes there are other bimaris other than corruption.
Me-agree.
You-If the govt. officials and the politicians are not trustworthy, do you think it is easy to make a development in those(poverty, education etc.) areas.
Me-Politician are made by mass by election, we have choice to through out in coming election.Mostly Govt. official are elected by competition , we should participate in exam and we should go in Govt. sector to cleanness.
You-Govt is the root of a country. If the root itself is decayed what use is it in watering.
Me-Agree.When we have choice then no need to go beyond the law and constitution.Who makes Govt. ? We are ..Right ? Don't elect , be elected go in sansad and make rule,but everyone cannot be elected then it is duty of elected members.
Law and rule does not make on the road with heard mentality public, although there are some procedure which we should follow. Judgement should be given by the judge not by the typist.Treatment should be done by Dr. not by the compounder.
Corruption should be finished , but all procedure and changes should be done by according to constitution and Laws.
We should understand the procedure of making laws. Follow someone,no problem, but following should not be blindly.
Bottomline is first make currupt politicians, capitalists, businessman and government officers accountable by law to disclose their foreign assets. It will solve 80% problems in the country.
ReplyDelete